Para quem queira entender até onde vão as manobras de Trump e seus acólitos para reverterem os resultados das eleições, adiante transcreve-se artigo publicado aqui, CNN live.
Resumidamente, o governador do Texas interpôs recurso junto do Supremo Tribunal Federal no sentido de serem considerados inválidos votos em estados onde Biden superou Trump de forma decisiva para o resultado final. O governador texano invoca lei que, na sua essência, tem como objectivo dirimir disputas entre estados que envolvam interesses bilaterais, p.e., linhas de fronteira, utilização de caudais fluviais, etc. Nunca no passado foi invocada a ideia abstrusa de que as leis que regem os processos eleitorais num estado prejudicam os outros. Dito de outro modo, os resultados nos estados ganhos por Biden prejudicam, segundo o governador texano, o estado do Texas porque uma administração Biden será menos conveniente que uma segunda administração Trump. Do lado texano já alinharam outros dezassete governadores em estados republicanos. Se o Supremo Tribunal Federal acolhesse a pretensão do texano+17 instalar-se-ia guerra entre estados.
Curiosamente, há cerca de século e meio, no rescaldo Guerra Civil americana, um governador texano perdeu as eleições estaduais e recusou-se a ceder a cadeira presidencial ao sucessor ganhador. Tiveram que o retirar do gabinete partindo a porta à machadada.
Transcreve-se a seguir, também para os eventuais curiosos na matéria, relato publicado há dias no Washington Post, desta comédia à americana ocorrida nos anos 70 do século XIX.
Explaining the Supreme Court lawsuit from Texas and Trump challenging Biden's win
By Ariane de Vogue and Dan Berman, CNN
Updated 2047 GMT (0447 HKT) December 10, 2020 -
(CNN)Although all 50 states have certified their election results and the Supreme Court swiftly rejected an emergency request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block election results in the commonwealth, the justices are now grappling with a new controversial bid from Texas, supported by President Donald Trump and 17 other Republican-led states.
Who is suing?
What do the Republicans want?
Is there any precedent?
The Supreme Court has 6 conservatives. Does that guarantee Trump will win?
When will we hear from the court?
Then what?
What is original jurisdiction?
What evidence do Trump and Republicans have?
Who are Trump's new lawyers?
CNN's Jake Tapper, Kristin Wilson, Manu Raju and Daniella Diaz contributed to this report.
The Texas governor who refused to concede after losing a bitter election
When Edmund J. Davis started out in politics in the 1850s, he was Whig. Then he became a Democrat. When the Civil War gripped the country, Davis — like then-Gov. Sam Houston — opposed secession. He led a cavalry regiment for the Union during the war, fighting all over the South and witnessing Confederate Gen. Edmund Kirby Smith’s surrender in Texas.
Davis’s wife and children were treated badly by Confederates, and Davis himself had narrowly escaped lynching only by the intervention of Mexico, according to historian and Davis biographer Carl Moneyhon. So when state constitutional conventions were held in 1866 and 1868 to 1869, Davis showed up with some personal and political bones to pick.
Now a Radical Republican representing the border region, Davis worked to block ex-Confederates (largely Democrats) from political power and expand voting rights to Black Texans. In 1869, he defeated a fellow Republican in the race for governor.
For a long time, Davis was depicted as a typical “scalawag,” a derisive term for White Southerners who became Republicans during the Reconstruction era, supposedly out of self-interest. Moneyhon’s biography restores Davis’s reputation somewhat, pointing out he started public schooling in the state, stood up to police forces and further expanded civil rights for newly freed Black people.
When he ran for reelection in December 1872, ex-Confederates had regained the right to vote, and Davis got a Democratic opponent, Richard Coke. Voter intimidation, fraud and other irregularities occurred on both sides, to what degree is unclear. When Davis lost by a margin of 2 to 1, he declared the entire election invalid. The Texas Supreme Court agreed, but Democrats declared that, actually, the court was invalid.
In mid-January 1873, Coke arrived in Austin to assume the governorship. Davis locked himself inside the governor’s office in the Texas Capitol building; Coke and his supporters took over the second floor, where he took the oath of office.
For two days, there were two governors. Armed supporters for both men paced the streets, and violence seemed inevitable.
If Trump refuses to leave on Inauguration Day, as some have feared, President-elect Joe Biden’s campaign has said the government “is perfectly capable of escorting trespassers out of the White House.” That isn’t far off from what happened to Davis. When he summoned a local militia to protect him, it sided with Coke instead.
Davis then begged President Ulysses S. Grant, a fellow Republican, to send in federal troops. On Jan. 17 came Grant’s reply: No federal troops, and “Would it not be prudent, as well as right, to yield to the verdict of the people as expressed by their ballots?”
Davis gave up, effectively ending Reconstruction in Texas. There wouldn’t be another Republican governor until party realignment 100 years later. But on his way out, he locked the door to the governor’s office and took the keys with him. Coke’s supporters busted it open with an ax.
No comments:
Post a Comment