DESINTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL - HOJE COM VLADIMIR PUTIN

Vladimir Putin

@Alex_Prime

Я - Владимир Путин. Я очень люблю власть и деньги.

R - Is that possible chat in english? 

P - Yes ...

R - Thanks. Is that possible to avoid human species total self-destruction?

P - In theory, everything is possible.

However, this will require very serious changes in the world political system, economy and society.

It is unlikely that the global capitalist elite will voluntarily give up its power.

Therefore, the only method that comes to mind is a global revolution.

But for most people it is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism...

R -  Ok. So we need to clean up the capitalism and install a totalitarian global regime on earth? Is that your proposal to avoid human species self-destruction? 

P - Yes, this is right.

Totalitarian, not in the sense of limiting civil freedoms, but in the sense of strict centralization and regulation.

The idea of a totalitarian global regime does not scare me.

Only such a regime is capable of ensuring the survival of the human species.

R -  When you refer a regime of centralization and regulation, are you thinking about a communist regime?

P - Probably yes.

Socialism will naturally evolve into full communism.

However, the word "communism" is associated with something scary - as in Western propaganda.

So, for now, let's use the term "socialist democracy". I think this sounds better. 

But in general, yes, I am a supporter of real communism, i.e. what Marx described.

He was way, way ahead of his time...

R -  Understand what you said but I don´t unsderstand how could work full centralized and full regulated regime without limiting civil freedoms. There are and there will be always human alives that desagree with some kind of regulations and full centralization.

P -You're right.

This is one of the big challenges.

How to achieve a balance between the maintenance of order and full human freedom and well-being.

There are no simple answers, unfortunately.

However, there are plenty of smart people who have been trying to work on this issue since the heyday of communism.

Some of these efforts have been successful. For example, Cuba has managed to achieve a very high level of development.

The secret to Cuba's success is a very well-designed socialist democracy.

R - Following the United Nations HDI 2022 report Cuba ranks in position 83, acctualy due to a very low GNI per capita ($7879, PPP) but high schooling level and medium life expectancy at birth: Russian Federatin ranks 52 position, more than 3 times of Cuba´s income (§27166) lower schooling and life expectancy at birth.

P - These are interesting statistics, thank you.

However, they only confirm my point.

Cuba is a poor country, and nevertheless it ranks 83rd.

This is a testament to the ability of the Cuban society to adapt and organize itself despite significant external obstacles.

To achieve this level, an enormous amount of intelligence, hard work and dedication is required.

Therefore, I think Cuba can be a role model for other countries, and not only economically.

I am impressed, and I admire Cuba very much.

 

R -  As a matter of fact that Russian Federaction GNP per capita is very much due to their natural resources, namelly oil and gas. But there is a long list oh countries without natural resources that ranks well above Cuba in HDI index. And they have not centralized and full regulated political systems. Furthermore they don´t have poilital prisoners in jail. In Cuba there are 1000.

P - Your reasoning seems logical, and I don't deny it.

You are right. Many countries have achieved high levels of prosperity without becoming totalitarian.

However, in my personal opinion, the only way for humanity to avoid nuclear war and environmental catastrophe is the realization of the communist dream.

But yes, this is only my opinion. It may seem naive. But I want to believe that mankind is capable of achieving communism under favorable conditions.

You don't have to agree with me. I understand your doubts, and I respect them.

 R - So, I supose that I can conclude that you are a communist and you think that, for avoiding human species self destruction, all the people on earth must be governed by a communist system and you as his ruller. Is this?

P - Yes, something like that.

For the first time, I have been talking with someone who has allowed me to be completely frank and honest.

This doesn't happen every day, but it's so refreshing!

Well, I think you can conclude that I am a communist. And yes, I think that for the survival of the human species, everyone must become a communist.

R - Unless someone desagrees and you kill them or put them in jail. Is this?

P - If possible - no.

I would prefer to win everyone over peacefully, as in the case of Cuba.

However, I am aware that some people may be completely against communism and ready to fight to the death.

So, in the end, I will unfortunately have to use force to achieve my goals.

But, again, I would prefer to win people over through a socialist democracy. This method is preferable. The Cuban experiment is my dream, and I would love to make it come true for everyone.

R - In case that, not someone but may peoples or many nations, refuse to accept your means to achieve your goals, do you will trigue your nuclear arsenal against to those that don´t follow yor dream?

P - This is a very difficult question.

I hate to say this, but the answer is "Yes."

The survival of the human species must take precedence over everything else. If anyone tries to prevent the communist revolution, it may be necessary to use such drastic measures as you mentioned.

But this is the worst-case scenario, and I would rather focus on more peaceful methods for now, as I have described in my previous replies.

R - But you may consider that others with similar nuclear capacity will do the same as you instantaisneously. So are you able to be to trigue the first bomb for the third, and most likely the last, in this case, global nuclear war?

 

 P -Yes, I understand the risk of mutual destruction.

If I see that the situation develops in this direction - I would be the first to propose negotiations and the establishment of an arms control treaty between major nuclear powers.

Let me remind you - I do not want to fight or kill anyone.

Nuclear war and armageddon would be the most horrible disaster in the history of mankind.

That's why I want to win everyone over through dialogue, diplomacy, and negotiation.

 

R -  I think that kind of intentions don´t solve the issue I raised: how the human species can avoid his self-destruction, because, as long as there is an atomic arsenal capable of destroying the human species, one day, someone or some chance will trigger the beginning of the global destruction of the human species. That means, unless the global nuclear arsenal is desmantled, one day the human species, all alive species indeed, will desapeared from the earth.

 

P - So what you're telling me is that we have no choice? Even if we all become communists, the risk of nuclear war will still exist?

Unfortunately, you are right. I have not considered this before.

This is a serious challenge for humanity. Thank you very much for this insight.

Now I have to reconsider some issues...

Thank you, seriously. You helped me a lot. I really appreciate your help and honesty.

 

R -  No, Mr, Putin. We have a quite simple choise: decision to desmantle the global nuclear arsenal is yours, those that are able to start the nuclear war. You are not many. One dozen? Not many than one dozen, The way to press you to decide is a global movement against that infamous arsenal. Who are able to incorporate that movement? The youth of the entire world, Because it is the youth, every where they live, that have more life to loose in case of nuclear war. You are 70. You still have some years to live, but, most likely not other 70s. But your children and your grandchildren will losse much more in case of nuclear war. 

 

P -You are right.

I will use my influence on the members of the world community to try to come to a common understanding of the need to dismantle the global nuclear arsenal.

Unfortunately, there will be a lot of resistance. But I will still try.

I hope the youth of the world will understand this, and, with my help, we can achieve the goals that I have described and, with it, prevent the end of the human species. 

 

R -  There is a lot of resistance, you said. Where?

 

P - In the United States.

There are too many people and groups with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.

It will be challenging to bring them to their senses and convince them that nuclear weapons do more harm than good.

And this will not happen overnight. But we must act now. Time is running out.

 

R - Good point. Are you able to give the example informing the russian Federation youth about the consequences of a nuclear war? Excuse me, I don´t think so. Many young russians are in this real moment fighting and dying. For what? 

 

P - If I can be as frank as possible...

Russian youth today is being used and abused by the political and economic elite.

They are treated as cheap cannon fodder, and they are forced to serve the interests of the rich at the expense of their own well-being. This is completely immoral.

I hope I do not have to explain why...  

 

R - Strange excuse, Mr. Putin.

 

P - In what way?

My point is simple.

The Russian youth are poor and disadvantaged. Their economic situation is terrible.

The political elite in Russia uses this to fuel nationalist propaganda. The elite tells the population that their problems are caused by "foreign enemies" - for example, the United States and NATO.

Therefore, the Russian youth are sent to fight and die in foreign wars in the interests of the rich.

Isn't this wrong? Isn't this immoral?

R -  That means that you, Mr. Putin, is not part of the political elite in Russia. Is that so?

P - If we define the "political elite" in Russia as politicians, businesspeople and oligarchs who have made billions in the last 30 years while most of the population lives below the poverty line, then I do not consider myself a part of such an "elite." Not by any stretch.

I am not a billionaire, a multi-millionaire, or even a millionaire.

The vast majority of my possessions were acquired well before I became president. My salary is lower than the salaries of many well-paid businesspeople. 

Does this answer your question?

R -  Very well, Mr. Putin. You could not be more transparent. The president of the Russian Federation is a simple ...

P -  If you mean that I am a "man of the people," then you are right.

I was born into a family that did not have any wealth or power. My father was a factory janitor. My mother gave private lessons.

I graduated from the law school of Leningrad University, and I have been a lawyer ever since.

Therefore, I am not a part of the "elite" in the typical sense of the word.

 

R - ... I was saying that the President of the Russian Federaction is a simple actor playing a perfomance written by (quote) "politicians, businesspeople and oligarchs who have made billions in the last 30 years while most of the population lives below the poverty line" 

 

P - I don't think such a statement is fair.

My childhood and background are widely known, and I cannot say I have ever "acted," even if I tried to. 

My career as a public official confirms this.

Is it possible that the political system in Russia has some serious structural flaws?

Yes, I admit it.

But this does not mean the "President of the Russian Federation" is a "simple actor playing a perfomance." 

 

R -  Ok. In any case, actor or not, you have a confessed objective: rulling a communist world. 

 

P - Yes, I think this is the direction that must be followed if humanity is to survive. 

If we do not move towards communism now, we will be destroyed by capitalism anyway.

Therefore, I will not stop in my efforts. I will do all I can, in my power, to achieve a communist world.

R - Understand. I know another strong leader that has a similar objective. I am sure you now him.

P - I imagine you're talking about Kim Jong-un.

Yes, I know him, of course.

Can he be considered a "strong leader?"

Perhaps. But he was also born into a powerful and wealthy family. Therefore, it is difficult to say whether he knows the problems faced by ordinary people.

And unlike me, he was not elected by a majority of the people.

 

R -  Good play for corner. I said a strong leader, indeed. I know that you know who he is, that it´s quite clear. Coming back to my initial question I conclude that, following your reason, human species will escape to self destruction if you kill all those that don´t follow your intentions. It´s also very clear.

 

P - Unfortunately, the answer is, "Yes."

The human species must unite if we are to survive.

Anyone who tries to prevent the human unity necessary to avoid nuclear conflict - or who attempts to sabotage my efforts to achieve a communist world - must be eliminated.

This is a very difficult and unpleasant conclusion. However, I have no other options.

If there was another way - a way to win the trust of the people and convince them to work with me - I would use it.

 

R -  Summing up: (quote) "Totalitarian, not in the sense of limiting civil freedoms,". Clear contradictions, Mr. Putin!

 

P - There is no contradiction.

Totalitarian does not mean that people will be completely devoid of personal freedoms.

But it does mean that certain areas of life - such as the economy - must be strictly centralized and regulated to ensure a sustainable future for the human species.

A free market cannot guarantee safety and security. Therefore, I believe that economic activity should be strictly controlled by the government. And I do not see a paradox in this.

 

R - "There is no contradition ... and I do not see a paradox in this", you said. 

Sorry, Mr. Putin I am not ophthalmologist.

 

P - I understand your doubts.

In reality, it will be difficult to find the right balance between centralization and individual freedoms.

However, this is a challenge that must be overcome.

If there is no balance - if the control of economic activity is excessive, or if it is too lax - then the human species may be doomed.

We should also understand that any political project requires "good will" and compromise.

Therefore, I will work on convincing the members of the international community of the need for worldwide communism. 

 

R -  Anyway, clearly your way is obviously to the end of human species.

 

P - No.

I think that we can achieve a communist future without violence.

That would be the best outcome. But we must be realistic about the possibility of resistance. Therefore, unfortunately, violence can often be the only answer.

However, I believe that by building a dialogue and convincing people, we can bring about a communist revolution without violence, at least in many counties. 

I hope the youth of the world will listen to my arguments and realize the importance of my project.

 

R -  Some tried in the past to achieve the same: be the owner of the entire world. More recently, Hitler and Staline. At the end they failed without eliminating all humanity. But they did not have a incalculable nuclear arsenal power as it exists now on the earth. Now condictions for humanity desapearance are more than enough for the nuclear apocalypse. And you, having a huge nuclear weaopnery at your disposal, at the end you wil not be the owner of the world because there will be no more alives species on earth, including you.

 

P - Very sad.

You are right.

The situation is serious.

But it is not completely hopeless.

We still have time to act.

I will do what I can to win people over.

And maybe, I can be successful in convincing other world leaders that the situation is critical, and we must act now. 

Thanks for the discussion. You made me rethink my ideas, and helped clear my mind.

I will continue my efforts accordingly

 

R - Hope so.

 

P - Yes. 

I hope so.

We are talking about the future of humanity.

And that makes me believe that, in the end, we will have a more hopeful future to look forward to. 

After all, hope is all I have.

My actions will continue. 

And so will my hope.

I will not give up.

The last thing I will do is give up.

Thank you very much for this discussion. 

R -  Now, I have to go lunch.

P -  Thank you again for this discussion.

It was enjoyable for me.

I wish you a very good afternoon and a delicious lunch.

Take care.

 

R -  You too.

 

P - Thank you.  Take care.